April was a wild ride for markets, and it felt like an extra-long month given all that transpired. After months of markets remaining resilient to policy risk, the Liberation Day announcement sent markets into a tailspin, to the point that it triggered yet another delay for most tariffs.
Subsequent weeks were filled with snippets of news that negotiations on a country-by-country basis were progressing. This sent the S&P 500 down over 10% in the early days of April, only for it to recover to be almost flat by the end of the month.
Add to this an election in Canada, talk about replacing Jerome Powell as head of the Fed, OPEC increasing production… some months are quiet; this was one of the noisiest.
The market is often driven by confidence, which was dramatically eroded by the policy uncertainty. This has created a market we would characterize as especially sensitive to policy news. If Mr. Hyde shows up on any given day with policy news the market dislikes, things drop. If the more market-friendly Dr. Jekyll policy news, markets recover.
Policy uncertainty is not new; however, this degree of market sensitivity is rather unique. And while the S&P gets most of the headlines, there were a lot of moving parts during the recent bout of volatility.
Bond yields dropped initially due to the market weakness, only to move higher as the market dropped. More recently, yields have started to come down because of economic concerns – more on that shortly. The U.S. dollar, usually a safe haven during periods of market weakness, fell a lot as the euro and yen rose. The TSX actually held up much better, thanks to a large gold weight in the index and limited technology exposure.
We would never say this is what we expected to start 2025, as the scenario has truly been unique. However, it is loosely following our expectations: The first phase would be a period of market weakness due to policy uncertainty. We had expected it earlier in the year and thought the market would recover once there was some clarity, even if it was bad news. Markets handle bad news better than uncertainty. Not sure we have a lot of certainty, but markets have partially recovered as uncertainty has diminished… for now.
So with markets partially or, in a few cases, fully recovered, what happens next? At some point later this year, we do believe earnings estimates will come under pressure and/or the economic data will soften enough to elicit recession fears in the market. If this transpires, we believe it may create an opportunity to shift. In the meantime, this market can continue to recover as long as Mr. Hyde doesn’t show up again.
Hard Fast Data & Earnings
Market valuations change often based on confidence in the future of earnings and the economy, which can oscillate substantially. In January, the S&P was trading over 22x forward earnings. During the despair of the tariff show, it dropped down to 19x and has since recovered to 20x. This was all a changing “P” in the PE ratio, as the “E”, earnings, remained relatively stable at $275. But what is that “E” going to do next?
While earnings revisions have been predominantly negative, with analysts trimming estimates, the magnitude has been minor. That’s not surprising, as the case to cut earnings would require a firm view that the economy is slowing or tariffs (once/if implemented) would hit earnings. Given the uncertainty on tariffs, it’s not surprising that analysts are not rushing out to ‘guess’ the outcome and adjust their estimates accordingly.
Instead, they are likely waiting for the policy to become clearer or for the companies to provide guidance indicating so. But companies are in the same boat, simply not knowing. The solution has been a strong trend of companies removing guidance – they don’t want to guess either way. Add it all up, and estimates are largely stable, but we would bet many analysts are ready to cut estimates if given an excuse, such as clarity on tariffs, company guidance, or if the economy starts to slow down more.
Consensus 2025 earnings estimates have come down over the past few months, but the magnitude is minor so far. This does run the risk of accelerating in the coming months, but not today!
As Q1 earnings season is about 70% complete for the S&P 500, the positive surprise rates are solid. In fact, Q1 consensus earnings had fallen from $62.50 to $60, but as companies report more resilient earnings, this estimate has climbed quickly back to $64. Corporations, most of them, are well-skilled at navigating changing business dynamics and adjusting to maintain profitability. So far, anyhow.
Tariff uncertainty is a challenge for corporations, adding more uncertainty in making decisions. A bigger challenge would be if the economy slows. We have previously highlighted the divergence between the soft or survey data and the hard economic data.
The chart below is the Bloomberg Economic Surprise Index, which measures how the economic data comes in relative to consensus expectations. It has started to turn negative, but this is largely due to the survey data. The soft data is dire, but these are surveys and not actual behaviour. For a measure of actual changing behaviour in the economy, you have to wait for the hard economic data, which is more delayed given the time needed to collect and calculate it. So far, that data is not really showing much economic weakness.
A strategy to get an earlier peek at the economy’s trajectory is the faster hard data, or higher frequency data. These are often alternative data series that are measuring actual behaviours (no surveys here). The volume of people flying often turns early when the economy is slowing, but so far, people are still flying. OpenTable seated diners in the U.S. are up high single digits over the past few weeks, so people are still eating out. Looking at retail spending data, people are still shopping. And while the labour market has seen a small uptick in weekly jobless claims, it remains at non-alarming levels.
For the most part, the faster hard economic data has not shown much sign of deterioration. So for now, we remain in a decent, fundamentally sound world from both earnings and the economic data, despite the ongoing uncertainty. Watching these faster-moving signals will be crucial in the coming weeks and months for signs of slowing that could lead to a recession scare of some sort. For now, it is all about policy uncertainty, ebbing and flowing.
Gold: Too Late to Buy, Time to Trim?
Amidst all the uncertainty this year, one asset has shone far more than the rest. Gold prices went on an absolute tear in April, reaching a peak of $3,500 US/oz. Gold has been trending higher for over a year, but the velocity of the most recent move was most impressive.
With gold currently up over 25% YTD as of the end of April, investors face a big question: is it too late to buy, or time to sell?
As a portfolio diversifier, gold has done a terrific job this year, but nothing goes up in a straight line forever. Over the past few years, there has been a somewhat fluid narrative in terms of what drives gold prices. In aggregate, we see five key drivers of gold demand, which are outlined below.
Central bank demand and policy shifts
This bullish argument has been in place for a number of years now. It’s been a primary driver of physical gold demand following the Covid crisis and the Russian invasion of Ukraine in early 2022. Central bank demand surged in 2022, reaching a record, and it has stayed elevated as central banks around the world aim to further diversify reserve holdings.
This trend is expected to continue, but it’s important to remember that this has been in place for some time, and this demand does not appear to be growing. 2022 was a peak year for central bank buying, which has been steady but declining slightly in 2023 and 2024.
Inflation and interest rates
Gold is seen as an inflation hedged. We won’t dig too deep into whether this reputation is earned or not. Most recently, it didn’t do much to protect from inflation in 2022 as gold prices were absolutely flat. It does tend to be more correlated with inflation expectations rather than actual increases in CPI.
Its relationship with interest rates is somewhat more quantifiable. Gold historically has a negative correlation to interest rates; it tends to do well when rates are falling and tends to struggle when rates are rising. Currently, the market is expecting nearly four cuts by the Fed this year. This has already increased from just about two a month ago.
While the trajectory of longer-term bond yields is difficult to ascertain, we can clearly see what the market is expecting on the short end of the curve. At this point, there is a real risk that expectations might be overly dovish.
Geopolitical risks
This is crisis alpha in action. During times of complete chaos, gold demand surges as a safe haven.
Gold is notoriously hard to value. It’s a non-productive asset with little tangible utility. It makes nice jewelry and has some utility in high-tech electronics, but the true value does not derive from these demands. One of the better mental models that helps gauge gold’s true value is that the price of gold is directionally proportional to the inverse of trust in the financial or political system. When trust in the system declines, gold shines.
Trust in the financial and political system was certainly rocked in April. It’s hard to quantify, but it’s certainly possible that trust bottomed along with peak market uncertainty in the days that followed the Liberation Day announcement.
Currency markets
A weaker U.S. dollar typically lifts gold prices as it’s priced in dollars. In 2025, the U.S. dollar index weakened considerably after reaching 110 in early January while markets were still enthralled with the prospects of a Trump 2.0 presidency. Since then, the greenback has fallen 10% and is currently trading just below 100.
Could the U.S. dollar fall further? For sure, but it really depends on the time frame. A 10% move in such a short amount of time is rather rare, especially for the world’s reserve currency. It takes a big shock to move it to this degree, and given the current technical oversold conditions, we’re more inclined to think that there will be some consolidation or reversal in the near future.
ETF flows and investor sentiment
After outflows from 2020-2024, tons of stored gold through ETFs bottomed in May of 2024. Over the past year, demand has increased by 11% – a decent uptick, but still quite far off the levels we saw in 2022. Though the trend higher remains in place, the pace of the increase appears to be topping out.
Looking at the four-week rate of change, ETF demand peaked in late March. While still positive, the pace of incremental flows has cooled. We still believe there is room to run for ETF flows, but retail buyers are price sensitive that the flows are slowing down.
The table below outlines these key drivers in a much more simplified and organized manner. All five of the key drivers have been working out recently. It’s been the perfect storm for gold, but storms only last so long.
Given that five of the five drivers are currently bullish, we’ve curbed our enthusiasm on gold. It’s done exceptionally well, and made some money in our multi-asset portfolios, but we’re weary of doing the round trip.
Too late to buy, time to trim?
In late April, gold reached what we would consider a tactical trim level. We remain constructive long-term, but we see potential for a corrective phase in the metal. Technically it reached overbought levels on all timeframes and reached the top of its multi-year channel in addition to an extreme deviation from its 200-day moving average.
Given that we’re already a few hundred dollars off the top, the corrective phase is already underway as upside momentum has been deteriorating. Within our multi-asset portfolios, we’ve trimmed gold exposure back to what we consider a neutral 3% weight. Proceeds of the sale were used to raise some cash within the portfolios.
Why Cash Could Still Make Sense in a Volatile Rate Environment
After seven consecutive rate cuts, the Bank of Canada (BoC) held its overnight rate steady at 2.75%, citing global uncertainty and mixed domestic data. With inflation still elevated and policy rates on hold, cash continues to offer a compelling mix of yield, liquidity, and protection against volatility, making it a prudent choice as investors wait for clearer signals on the policy and economic fronts.
In an environment where geopolitics remain unstable, fiscal support is still early-stage, and as inflation sits above target, liquidity becomes strategy, not just defence. With cash offering competitive yields and low volatility, maintaining strategic liquidity through cash remains a disciplined and effective approach to portfolio management.
Policy in pause: What the data says
The BoC remains in wait-and-see mode as economic signals send mixed messages. February GDP contracted by 0.25% – the weakest monthly reading in over two years – with widespread weakness across mining, real estate, and retail sectors. March’s preliminary estimate suggests a mild rebound, with Q1 GDP now tracking at 1.5% annualized, slightly below the BoC’s 1.8% forecast.
The Bank has reiterated that it will remain reactive rather than proactive, waiting for more decisive shifts in the data before adjusting its stance. With the overnight rate likely within the neutral range and trade-related uncertainties still lingering, the BoC has good reason to proceed with caution.
Soft indicators, particularly the manufacturing PMI, have continued to trend lower since the start of the year, remaining below the 50 threshold in both February and March – a clear sign of ongoing contraction in industrial activity. Business sentiment has yet to recover meaningfully, reinforcing downside risks to the growth outlook.
Hard data presents a mixed picture. Employment fell by 32,000 in March – the largest drop in three years – pushing the unemployment rate to 6.7%. February retail sales declined 0.4%, though core retail (excluding autos) rose by 0.5%, indicating some resilience in discretionary spending.
Inflation remains central to the BoC’s mandate. CPI picked up to 2.3% year-over-year, reflecting some persistence in underlying price pressures. Tariff-related effects remain a key risk going forward. The BoC continues to assess whether current interest rates remain appropriately restrictive to guide inflation back to target. While further hikes appear unlikely, persistent inflation — especially if tariff-related pressures materialize — could delay the timing or extent of future rate cuts.
Fiscal dynamics: A Carney government's impact
With Mark Carney now confirmed as prime minister, fiscal stimulus will become a central policy lever. The platform outlines more than $130 billion in new investments over 2025–2029, while generating an expected $51 billion in new revenues and savings. Carney’s plan focuses on long-term growth and making the economy more resilient. With debt-to-GDP at 107.5% — the third lowest in the G7 — Canada has room to use fiscal policy without putting public finances at risk.
Final thoughts: Stay liquid, stay flexible?
With growth signals softening in Canada and around the globe, the economic outlook remains murky. Given that markets have seen a robust rebound off the recent lows, we remain cautious on the markets and believe a healthy cash balance makes sense.
Markets currently anticipate two additional BoC rate cuts this year, potentially bringing the overnight rate to around 2.25%, though the timing remains uncertain. The BoC has signalled a shift toward data dependence, choosing to respond to incoming evidence rather than front-run policy moves. If cuts resume, it may reflect persistent economic weakness, further reinforcing the defensive value of cash.
Market Cycle & Portfolio Positioning
The market cycle indicators include a number of faster-moving signals, and lately, they have been softening pretty quickly. While they’re not in the danger zone at this point, the loss of momentum is very noticeable.
The number of signals that have turned bearish is pretty widespread. Over the past month, the tally is Rates -1, broader US Economy no change, US Manufacturing -1, US housing -2, Global Economy -3 and Fundamentals -2. That doesn’t scream recession, but the rumblings are getting louder.
Given this is with a backdrop of rising equity prices, something has to give. Either this data changes course or the market will… at some point.
We have made a small change to our portfolio positioning, reducing exposure to real assets by reducing gold. While we are not necessarily bearish on the price of gold, it has simply been such a perfect environment for gold over the past few months that we wanted to reduce. Gold does well during periods of policy uncertainty, and that has certainly been evident over the past few months. As we believe early April was likely peak policy uncertainty, we believe this move is prudent. This added to our cash buffer.
Final Note
Policy uncertainty rocked markets in April, and more recently, easing policy pressures have enabled markets to materially recover.
This highlights the danger of reacting to policy news, as it can change very quickly. Could it ratchet up again? For sure. Could it keep improving? Yep. This is more of a coin flip, as a tweet or Truth Social post can change the environment quickly. Given the market recovery, it may be getting close to levels that ignore the risk of future uncertainty.
More importantly, the risk is that deteriorating earnings and economic data may become a larger driver of markets in the coming months. These factors can’t be soothed by a tweet. A recession scare in the coming months is a rising probability event. Stay defensive, as this may also create opportunities.
— Craig Basinger, Derek Benedet, Hilbert Wan, and Brett Gustafson
Get the latest market insights in your inbox every week.
Sources: Charts are sourced to Bloomberg L. P.
The content of this document is for informational purposes only and is not being provided in the context of an offering of any securities described herein, nor is it a recommendation or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security. The information is not investment advice, nor is it tailored to the needs or circumstances of any investor. Information contained in this document is not, and under no circumstances is it to be construed as, an offering memorandum, prospectus, advertisement or public offering of securities. No securities commission or similar regulatory authority has reviewed this document, and any representation to the contrary is an offence. Information contained in this document is believed to be accurate and reliable; however, we cannot guarantee that it is complete or current at all times. The information provided is subject to change without notice.
Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investment funds. Please read the prospectus before investing. If the securities are purchased or sold on a stock exchange, you may pay more or receive less than the current net asset value. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated. Certain statements in this document are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements (“FLS”) are statements that are predictive in nature, depend on or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate” or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS. FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are, by their nature, based on numerous assumptions. Although the FLS contained in this document are based upon what Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager believe to be reasonable assumptions, Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager cannot assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS. The reader is cautioned to consider the FLS carefully and not to place undue reliance on the FLS. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.